Tomlin J Paul1§, OD Nembhard 2 1 Department of Community
Health and Psychiatry, UWI, Gibraltar Road, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica
2 Health Plus Associates, Elma Crescent, Kingston 20, Jamaica
§ - corresponding author
Email addresses:
TJP: tomlin.paul@uwimona.edu.jm
ODN: titan@cwjamaica.com
Background:
Patients’ characteristics in general practice are as critical to outcomes
as are the characteristics of their disease or disorder. A full understanding
of consulting patterns will contribute to improvements in practice management
and quality of care. Despite the growing literature on frequent attendance in
general practice, there are no studies addressing this issue in the Caribbean.
No significant work has been done on consulting patterns of ambulatory care
patients except for what has been gleaned from the Primary Care Operational
Research studies (PRICOR) of the 1980s which took place in Jamaica (Desai P
et al, 1989). But these studies focussed more on the production line type of
assessments, pertinent to operations management and did not assess consulting
patterns with patients’ characteristics in mind.
Patients who have above average attendance in general practice no doubt raise
a number of questions in the practitioner's mind. What do these frequent visits
signify? Are frequent attenders more likely to be unhealthy individuals seeking
care for a number of problems, or are they persons who are in fact quite well
as a result of their frequent visits? Studies have examined physician, patient
and practice factors related to frequent visits. In one study in the UK, it
was noted that frequent attenders were more likely to have lower educational
status, were more satisfied with their practitioner, and had higher scores of
anxiety and depression and lower perceived quality of life (Kersnik J et al,
2001). The frequency of chronic diseases was also a risk factor for attendance.
Caribbean countries should take interest in this subject given the increasing
burden of chronic diseases (diabetes and hypertension) in the population.
METHODS AND AIMS
This study is an initial examination of selected characteristics of frequent
attenders attending a private group general practice. It aims to determine the
sociodemographic profile of this subgroup and to ascertain the presence of the
chronic diseases, diabetes and hypertension and the frequency of prescriptions
for hypnotics and anxiolytics.
The study was conducted at Health Plus Associates which is a small group medical
practice with a team of 4 general practitioners providing service to a Kingston
suburban community and its environs since 1993. The four practitioners are all
graduates of the Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MB BS) degree programme
of the University of the West Indies. Patients are known to attend the group
practice to see their "usual" doctor but at times may cross over to
see another physician. All patients visiting are registered on a worksheet with
the particular physician's name on it. These worksheets are kept to a high standard
of recording as they represent a key part of the administrative management system
of the group practice.
All visits for patients attending Health Plus Associates to see a selected (index)
physician during 1998 were extracted from worksheets for that period. Using
an excel database these visits were subsequently reduced so as to represent
a frequency listing of visits for individual patients. Patients above the 96th
percentile corresponding to patients with five or more visits to the index physician
were selected and classified as frequent attenders. All files for patients in
this group were reviewed and data extracted that were relevant to the study
(age, gender, occupation, address, health insurance coverage, diagnosis and
medication). The actual number of visits made by patients for 1998 was adjusted
where necessary, given that patients were likely to have seen physicians other
than the index physician during the study period.
RESULTS
Visit Frequency
The index physician had a total of 1,934 patient-visits for 1998. When these
visits were collapsed to represent patients, there was a 20% reduction in the
number giving a corresponding 1,224 patients. Just fewer than 7 % of these patients
accounted for almost a quarter (22%) of total visits. The mean annual visit
rate for the group of 1,224 patients was 1.6(SD 1.3) visits per annum. Frequent
attenders as defined by this study (above the 96th percentile) consisted of
a group of 39 patients (3.2% of total patients visiting for 1998). The mean
annual visit rate for this sub-group after adjustment for visits to non-index
physicians was 10.3(SD 4.8) visits per annum. Seventy-five percent of patients
had health insurance coverage.
Patient Socio-Demographics
The male: female ratio was 1:8.3 with men accounting for 10.8 percent of frequent
attenders. The age range was from 1 to 81 years, but there was only one patient
who was under the age of 18 years. The mean age was 39.9 yrs (SD 20.2). Approximately
60 percent of frequent attenders were in very close proximity to the practice
living in the same or adjacent geographical zone. Fifty-four percent of patients
held professional office-based jobs with a tendency for these to be in the accounting
or banking sector. Only seven frequent attenders (18 %) had a diagnosis of diabetes
or hypertension recorded in their records up to the time of their visits in
1998. Nearly half (48.6%) of frequent attenders had a prescription for a hypnotic
or anxiolytic drug at least once during their visits in 1998. Antidepressants
were only prescribed on one occasion.
DISCUSSION
This study provides a first look at the profile of frequent attenders in a small
group practice and it must be noted however that there is no comparison group.
However the study raises a number of hypotheses requiring further exploration
and provides some initial insights about the potential nature of this interesting
sub-group of patients called frequent attenders.
The sub-group is predominantly female (89.2 %) which is not surprising. Women
are known generally to be more likely to visit physicians than men (Woodwell
DA, 1999), so the likelihood that they will be in a FAs sub-group will be high.
Despite a small sub-group of older individuals in the sub-group, the majority
of individuals are adults in the late 20's to 40's age group. There is a surprising
low prevalence of chronic diseases (diabetes and hypertension) among these FAs
given the general community prevalence. This however is consistent with the
younger age profile of the group where these conditions are not in a particularly
high prevalence. But based on the assumption that chronic disease patients are
likely to make more visits to the doctor, one would expect a higher proportion
of such patients. Self-selection could also be operating here with this practice
clientele.
There are no established data regarding prescriptions for anxiolytics and hypnotics
in general practice in the Caribbean with which to compare the data from this
study. However it is fair to say that a near 50 percent "ever-prescribed"
prevalence for anxiolytics/hypnotics is somewhat high in this patient sub-group.
If the assumption is that this level of prescribing is not the norm for low
attenders, then it is more likely to be associated with frequent attendance.
Somatization has been seen as a problem with FAs. Hypochondriacal beliefs and
psychiatric comorbidity were connected with frequent attenders' somatization
in one study (Jyvasjarvi S et al, 2001). Hypochondriacal beliefs explained somatizers'
frequent attendance and there was a significant interaction effect between somatization
and hypochondriacal beliefs when explaining frequent attendance. These might
be factors operating in this study contributing to the apparent high level of
anxiolytic/hypnotic prescriptions.
Overall in this study, the profile of the frequent attender is that of a young
to middle aged adult female, professional or semi-professional who lives in
close proximity to the medical facility without substantial chronic disease
but more likely to be experiencing symptoms requiring anxiolytics and hypnotics.
Of course one will have to consider the role of physician factors in a larger
study. Are there considerations about physicians which perpetuate frequent attendance?
Consulting style and prescribing habits may be all important here. Neal et al
notes that there is considerable variation in the numbers and proportions of
consultations with frequent attenders between individual doctors (Neal RD et
al, 2000). But the reasons why some doctors have more consultations with frequent
attenders are unclear. Kersnick et al showed that the factors influencing frequent
visits were more attributable to patient factors than physician factors (Kersnik
J et al, 2001). Through multivariate modeling it was shown that 16.9% of the
variation was attributed to patient characteristics and 3.1% to GP characteristics.
Some doctors may actively encourage frequent attendance. While many frequent
attenders have clear allegiances to one doctor, many also consult widely with
a large number of doctors (Neal RD et al, 2000).
A follow-up to this study will be to include a comparison group so as to look
at the strength of association of various factors that are thought to be linked
with frequent attendance and tracking of high and low attenders over time. In
addition, future studies should include a qualitative angle so the nature of
the consultation can be assessed. Smucker et al have identified different encounter
types such as: simple medical, ritual visit, complicated medical, the tango,
simple frustration, psychosocial disconnect, medical disharmony, and the heartsink
visit (Smucker DR et al, 2001). Different visit types can have implications
for return visits as it relates to physician's comfort levels and patient's
satisfaction.
CONCLUSION:
Frequent attenders in this practice tend to be adult to middle aged professional
or semi-professional women, living within close proximity to the medical centre
and likely to be covered by health insurance. Diabetes and hypertension are
not in high prevalence in this group but there is an apparent excess of prescriptions
for anxiolytics and hypnotics suggesting psychological related disorders
REFERENCES
DESAI, P, ZACAHARIAH, B, MCCAW-BINNS, A, WHITE, S. (1989) Patient-flow and waiting
times in general medical and dental clinics in Jamaica’s primary health
care services. West Indian Medical Journal, Vol. 39, 100-108.
KERSNIK, J, SVAB, I, VEGNUT, I M. (2001) Frequent attenders in general practice:
quality of life, patient satisfaction, use of medical services and GP characteristics.
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol.19, 174-7.
JYVASJARVI, S, JOUKAMAA, M, VAISANEN, E, LARIVAARA, P, KIVELA, S, KEINANEN-KIUKAANNIEMI,
S. (2001) Somatizing frequent attenders in primary health care. Journal of Psychosomatic
Research, Vol. 50, 185-92.
NEAL, RD, HEYWOOD, PL, MORLEY, S. (2000) Frequent attenders' consulting patterns
with general practitioners. British Journal of General Practice Vol. 50, 972-6.
SMUCKER, DR, ZINK, T, SUSMAN, JL, CRABTREE, BF. (2001) A framework for understanding
visits by frequent attenders in family practice. Journal of Family Practice
Vol. 50, 847-52.
WOODWELL, DA. (1999) National ambulatory medical care survey: 1997 summary.
Adv Data, 305:1-28.
All pages copyright ©Priory Lodge Education Ltd 1994-2005.